Challenging The Process View of Action

Manuscrito (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate in the ontology of action about whether actions are processes, events, relations, or sui generis entities. This paper focuses on the process view, the view that actions are processes. I challenge it in two ways. First, I argue that some actions are not processes because their performance need not be associated with or accompanied by a process. Second, I critically discuss three main arguments that have been advanced to support the process view. My view, the pluralist view, is that process-theorists are right to hold that certain actions are processes, but wrong to maintain that every action is a process: activities are processes, acts are not, and some acts are composed of a process whereas others are not.

Author's Profile

Robin Timothée Bianchi
Université de Neuchâtel

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
9 (#102,070)

6 months
9 (#100,942)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?