Aristotle on Illusory Perception: Phantasia without Phantasmata

Ancient Philosophy 21 (1):57-71 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In De Anima III.3 Aristotle presents his official discussion of phantasia (“imagination” in most translations). At the very outset of the discussion Aristotle offers as an endoxon that “phantasia is that in virtue of which we say that a phantasma occurs to us” (428a1-2). Now a natural reading of this claim, taken up by many commentators, can pose a problem for Aristotle’s overall account of perception. Here I argue that, although it would be silly to deny that Aristotle considers phantasia to be that in virtue of which a phantasma occurs to someone, it is not silly to deny that phantasmata are present in every case in which phantasia is operative. This suggestion bolsters the idea that, according to Aristotle’s account of veridical perception, we can understand the world as making itself perceptually manifest to the perceiver.
ISBN(s)
0740-2007  
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BIRAOI
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-02-06
Latest version: 2 (2016-02-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.Price, Huw & McDowell, John
Aristotle on Perception.Everson, Stephen
Sense and Sensibilia.Austin, J. L. & Warnock, G. J.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
227 ( #14,743 of 42,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #14,812 of 42,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.