Civil disobedience in a distorted public sphere

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rawls’s notion of civil disobedience, which still dominates the literature on this subject, comprises at least these three characteristics: it involves breaking the law, is non-violent and public. But implicit in this notion is a certain tension: it shows pessisimism about the proper functioning of the public sphere as earlier normal appeals have failed, but it also displays a certain optimism about its proper functioning as it assumes that civil disobedience may be effective. In my paper I argue that Rawls cannot explain how civil disobedience may be effective as a public appeal for social justice because he does not fully understand what it means for civil disobedience to be public in relation to the public sphere. His analysis would require an additional notion of publicity which, as I argue, is the notion of hermeneutical publicity. From a Bourdieusian perspective I then make a case for the claim that public spheres always suffer from hermeneutic invisibility. This may explain why non-violent appeals for social justice fail as dialogical practices. Finally I suggest how we nevertheless could understand that civil disobedience can be effective as a dialogical practice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLACDI-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-08-13
Latest version: 2 (2017-08-15)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Forms of Talk.Goffman, Erving

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-08-13

Total views
77 ( #36,211 of 48,943 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #33,541 of 48,943 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.