Moral Realism and Philosophical Angst

In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 15 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper defends pro-realism, the view that it is better if moral realism is true rather than any of its rivals. After offering an account of philosophical angst, I make three general arguments. The first targets nihilism: in securing the possibility of moral justification and vindication in objecting to certain harms, moral realism secures something that is non-morally valuable and even essential to the meaning and intelligibility of our lives. The second argument targets antirealism: moral realism secures a desirable independence for moral justification that is qualitatively different from the anti-realistic construal of independence that is only explicable in terms of degrees of distance from our subjective responses and attitudes. Finally, I argue that while the pan-expressivist semantic program of quasi-realism has significant effects on what can be appropriately said in meta-ethical discourse, it provides no comfort to the pro-realist who is already angsty about anti-realism.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLAMRA-14
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-29
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-22

Total views
117 ( #39,677 of 2,439,596 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #15,872 of 2,439,596 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.