Taking War Seriously

Philosophy 94 (1):139-60 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Just war theory − as advanced by Michael Walzer, among others − fails to take war seriously enough. This is because it proposes that we regulate war with systematic rules that are comparable to those of a game. Three types of claims are advanced. The first is phenomenological: that the theory's abstract nature interferes with our judgment of what is, and should be, going on. The second is meta-ethical: that the theory's rules are not, in fact, systematic after all, there being inherent contradictions between them. And the third is practical: that by getting people to view war as like a game, the theory promotes its ‘aestheticization’ (play being a central mode of the aesthetic) such that those who fight are encouraged to act in dangerous ways. And war, it goes without saying, is already dangerous enough.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLATWS
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-02-01
Latest version: 6 (2022-08-09)
View other versions
Added to PP
2018-08-29

Downloads
147 (#44,726)

6 months
19 (#42,844)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?