If perception is probabilistic, why doesn't it seem probabilistic?

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 373 (1755) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The success of the Bayesian approach to perception suggests probabilistic perceptual representations. But if perceptual representation is probabilistic, why doesn't normal conscious perception reflect the full probability distributions that the probabilistic point of view endorses? For example, neurons in MT/V5 that respond to the direction of motion are broadly tuned: a patch of cortex that is tuned to vertical motion also responds to horizontal motion, but when we see vertical motion, foveally, in good conditions, it does not look at all horizontal. This article argues that the best Bayesian approach to this problem does not require probabilistic representation.

Author's Profile

Ned Block
New York University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-23

Downloads
335 (#25,335)

6 months
24 (#41,119)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?