Fundamental Hope and Practical Identity

Philosophical Papers 46 (3):345–371 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article considers the question ‘What makes hope rational?’ We take Adrienne Martin’s recent incorporation analysis of hope as representative of a tradition that views the rationality of hope as a matter of instrumental reasons. Against this tradition, we argue that an important subset of hope, ‘fundamental hope’, is not governed by instrumental rationality. Rather, people have reason to endorse or reject such hope in virtue of the contribution of the relevant attitudes to the integrity of their practical identity, which makes the relevant hope not instrumentally but intrinsically valuable. This argument also allows for a new analysis of the reasons people have to abandon hope and for a better understanding of non-fundamental, ‘prosaic’ hopes.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLSFHA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-12-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-12-20

Total views
260 ( #20,303 of 56,050 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,495 of 56,050 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.