Ultra-liberal attitude reports

Philosophical Studies 175 (8):2043-2062 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Although much has been written about the truth-conditions of de re attitude reports, little attention has been paid to certain ‘ultra-liberal’ uses of those reports. We believe that if these uses are legitimate, then a number of interesting consequences for various theses in philosophical semantics follow. The majority of the paper involves describing these consequences. In short, we argue that, if true, ultra-liberal reports: bring counterexamples to a popular approach to de re attitude ascriptions, which we will call ‘descriptivism’; and combine with independently plausible principles about the logic of belief to imply that subjects can achieve omniscience about what exists from the armchair. Although we are not committed to the view that ultra-liberal reports are false, in the final part of the paper we discuss the prospects of pursuing a line according to which the acceptability of such reports ought not be taken at face value. We conclude by arguing that those who are sympathetic with this move might have reason to doubt the truth of an even broader class of acceptable de re attitude reports, namely those that have been taken to undermine orthodox accounts of de re attitude ascriptions.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUUAR
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Quantifying In.Kaplan, David

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-07-10

Total downloads
80 ( #23,625 of 37,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #18,370 of 37,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.