Change and Contradiction: A Criticism of the Hegelian Account of Motion

In Rodrigo Freire Edgar Almeida & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Seminário Lógica no Avião. Brasilia: Universidade de Brasilia. pp. 135-148 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his In Contradiction (1987), Priest levelled three powerful arguments against the received Russellian view of change and motion. He argued that his preferred paraconsistent theory of change, the Hegelian account, is immune from these objections. Here I argue that these three arguments are sound, but that the Hegelian account falls pray to them too. I conclude, however, that the Hegelian account is in a better position to tackle these challenges.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOCCAC-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Logic of Paradox.Priest, Graham
The Delusive Illusion of Passage.Boccardi, Emiliano & Perelda, Federico
Instantaneous Motion.Carroll, John W.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-16

Total views
67 ( #38,907 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #19,843 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.