Change and Contradiction: A Criticism of the Hegelian Account of Motion

In Rodrigo Freire Edgar Almeida & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Seminário Lógica no Avião. Brasilia: Universidade de Brasilia. pp. 135-148 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his In Contradiction (1987), Priest levelled three powerful arguments against the received Russellian view of change and motion. He argued that his preferred paraconsistent theory of change, the Hegelian account, is immune from these objections. Here I argue that these three arguments are sound, but that the Hegelian account falls pray to them too. I conclude, however, that the Hegelian account is in a better position to tackle these challenges.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOCCAC-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-09-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-09-16

Total views
100 ( #40,288 of 58,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #32,862 of 58,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.