The Material Conditional is Sufficient to Model Deliberation

Erkenntnis:1-25 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate in the philosophical literature whether the conditionals that are central to deliberation are subjunctive or indicative conditionals and, if the latter, what semantics of the indicative conditional is compatible with the role that conditionals play in deliberation. We propose a possible-world semantics where conditionals of the form “if I take action a the outcome will be x” are interpreted as material conditionals. The proposed framework is illustrated with familiar examples and both qualitative and probabilistic beliefs are considered. Issues such as common-cause cases and ‘Egan-style’ cases are discussed.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BONTMC-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-03-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-02-23

Total views
62 ( #55,006 of 65,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #25,062 of 65,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.