Inerrancy Is Not a Strong or Classical Foundationalism

Themelios 44 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The general idea of strong foundationalism is that knowledge has a foundation in well warranted beliefs which do not derive any warrant from other beliefs and that all our other beliefs depend on these foundational ones for their warrant. Although inerrancy posits Scripture as a solid foundation for theology, the idea that the doctrine of biblical inerrancy involves a strong foundationalist epistemology is deeply problematic. In fact, inerrancy does not require any particular view of the structure of knowledge, and notable sources on inerrancy tout it in ways inconsistent with most forms of strong foundationalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-12-02
View other versions
Added to PP

139 (#46,122)

6 months
12 (#55,504)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?