Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality

Consciousness and Cognition 33:524-535 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper discusses the ecological case for epistemic innocence: does biased cognition have evolutionary benefits, and if so, does that exculpate human reasoners from irrationality? Proponents of ‘ecological rationality’ have challenged the bleak view of human reasoning emerging from research on biases and fallacies. If we approach the human mind as an adaptive toolbox, tailored to the structure of the environment, many alleged biases and fallacies turn out to be artefacts of narrow norms and artificial set-ups. However, we argue that putative demonstrations of ecological rationality involve subtle locus shifts in attributions of rationality, conflating the adaptive rationale of heuristics with our own epistemic credentials. By contrast, other cases also involve an ecological reframing of human reason, but do not involve such problematic locus shifts. We discuss the difference between these cases, bringing clarity to the rationality debate.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOUCEG-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How the Mind Works.Pinker, Steven

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Boudry, Maarten; Paglieri, Fabio & Pigliucci, Massimo

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-03

Total views
78 ( #33,227 of 45,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #27,322 of 45,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.