The Open Future, Free Will and Divine Assurance: Responding to Three Common Objections to the Open View

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay I respond to three of the most forceful objections to the open view of the future. It is argued that a) open view advocates must deny bivalence; b) the open view offers no theodicy advantages over classical theism; and c) the open view can’t assure believers that God can work all things to the better. I argue that the first objection is premised on an inadequate assessment of future tensed propositions, the second is rooted in an inadequate assessment of free will, and the third is grounded in an inadequate assessment of God’s intelligence.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOYTOF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-10

Total views
101 ( #21,074 of 37,265 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #4,995 of 37,265 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.