Functionalist response-dependence avoids missing explanations

Analysis 71 (2):297-300 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that there is a flaw in the way that response-dependence has been formulated in the literature, and this flawed formulation has been correctly attacked by Mark Johnston’s Missing Explanation Argument (1993, 1998). Moving to a better formulation, which is analogous to the move from behaviourism to functionalism, avoids the Missing Explanation Argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRAFRA-5
Revision history
First archival date: 2011-01-25
Latest version: 2 (2013-06-25)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Found: The Missing Explanation.Menzies, Peter & Pettit, Philip
Found: The Missing Explanation.Menzies, Peter & Church, Alonso

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-01-25

Total views
338 ( #9,284 of 41,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #34,259 of 41,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.