Glaring omissions in traditional theories of art

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I investigate the role of feminist theorizing in relation to traditionally-based aesthetics. Feminist artworks have arisen within the context of a patriarchal Artworld dominated for thousands of years by male artists, critics, theorists, and philosophers. I look at the history of that context as it impacts philosophical theorizing by pinpointing the narrow range of the paradigms used in defining “art.” I test the plausibility of Danto’s After the End of Art vision of a post-historical, pluralistic future in which “anything goes,” a future that unfortunately rests upon the same outdated foundation as the concept “art.”
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
978-1-889680-19-4
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRAGOI-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-06-10

Total views
15 ( #49,830 of 50,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #39,831 of 50,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.