No New Solutions to the Logical Problem of the Trinity

Journal of Applied Logics 6 (6):1051-1092 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Analytic theologians have proposed numerous “solutions” to the Logical Problem of the Trinity (LPT), mostly versions of Social Trinitarianism (ST) and Relative Identity Trinitarianism (RI). Both types of solution are controversial, but many hold out hope that further “Trinitarian theorizing” may yield some as yet unimagined, and somehow importantly different, solution to the LPT. I first give a precise definition of the LPT and of what would count as a solution to it. I then show how, though there are infinitely many possible solutions, all solutions can be grouped together into a finite, exhaustive taxonomy, based precisely on those features which make them either controversial, heretical, or inconsistent. The taxonomy reveals why ST and RI have been the major proposed solutions, and also proves that there can be no importantly different, new solutions to the LPT.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRANNS
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-09-15

Total views
35 ( #48,350 of 53,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #18,348 of 53,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.