Surface Interpretation: Reply to Leddy

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (4):463-465 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In our paper "Surface and Deep Interpretation," we sought to provide detail and texture to Arthur Danto's views on interpretation, thereby explicating and defending them (as published in Mark Rollins, ed., Danto and His Critics (Blackwell, originally published 1993; second edition 2012). Leddy objects to our views; in the end, Danto's view, given our explication of it, remains tenable.

Author's Profile

Peg Brand Weiser
University of Oregon

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
577 (#38,755)

6 months
125 (#37,418)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?