Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):423-460 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the "two visual systems" hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver's bodily actions. In this paper, I review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis. I argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency

Author's Profile

Robert Briscoe
Ohio University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,812 (#411)

6 months
149 (#83,150)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?