Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the "two visual systems" hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver's bodily actions. In this paper, I review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis. I argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency
ISBN(s)
0031-8205
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRIESR
Upload history
First archival date: 2008-08-13
Latest version: 4 (2015-09-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,384 ( #3,155 of 65,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #23,921 of 65,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.