Fairness and the Architecture of Responsibility

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay explores a conception of responsibility at work in moral and criminal responsibility. Our conception draws on work in the compatibilist tradition that focuses on the choices of agents who are reasons-responsive and work in criminal jurisprudence that understands responsibility in terms of the choices of agents who have capacities for practical reason and whose situation affords them the fair opportunity to avoid wrongdoing. Our conception brings together the dimensions of normative competence and situational control, and we factor normative competence into cognitive and volitional capacities, which we treat as equally important to normative competence and responsibility. Normative competence and situational control can and should be understood as expressing a common concern that blame and punishment presuppose that the agent had a fair opportunity to avoid wrongdoing. This fair opportunity is the umbrella concept in our understanding of responsibility, one that explains it distinctive architecture.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-07-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Luck and the Unfairness of Morality.Robert Hartman - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (12):3179-3197.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
676 ( #5,337 of 50,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
92 ( #5,515 of 50,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.