Assertions Only?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is standardly believed that the only way to justify an assertion in the face of a challenge is by making another assertion. Call this claim ASSERTIONS ONLY. Besides its intrinsic interest, ASSERTIONS ONLY is relevant to deciding between competing views of the norms that govern reasoned discourse. ASSERTIONS ONLY is also a crucial part of the motivation for infinitism and Pyrrhonian skepticism. I suggest that ASSERTIONS ONLY is false: I can justify an assertion by drawing attention to something that clearly makes the assertion true, or likely true.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BROAO
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-06-25
Latest version: 6 (2013-09-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Uses of Argument.Toulmin, Stephen E.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-06-25

Total views
465 ( #5,002 of 38,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #17,552 of 38,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.