Defining Neglected Disease

Biosocieties 6 (1):51-70 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this article I seek to say what it is for something to count as a neglected disease. I argue that neglect should be defined in terms of efforts at prevention, mitigation and cure, and not solely in terms of research dollars per disability-adjusted life-year. I further argue that the trend towards multifactorialism and risk factor thinking in modern epidemiology has lent credibility to the erroneous view that the primary problem with neglected diseases is a lack of research. A more restrictive contrastive model of disease is endorsed as better suited to the definition of neglected disease.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRODND
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-05-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-05-24

Total downloads
610 ( #3,151 of 37,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #12,306 of 37,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.