The Problem of Measure Sensitivity Redux

Philosophy of Science 80 (3):378-397 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Fitelson (1999) demonstrates that the validity of various arguments within Bayesian confirmation theory depends on which confirmation measure is adopted. The present paper adds to the results set out in Fitelson (1999), expanding on them in two principal respects. First, it considers more confirmation measures. Second, it shows that there are important arguments within Bayesian confirmation theory and that there is no confirmation measure that renders them all valid. Finally, the paper reviews the ramifications that this "strengthened problem of measure sensitivity" has for Bayesian confirmation theory and discusses whether it points at pluralism about notions of confirmation.
Reprint years
2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRSTPO
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-08-10

Total views
141 ( #29,084 of 52,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #16,036 of 52,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.