The rehabilitation of spontaneity: A new approach in philosophy of action

Philosophy East and West 60 (2):pp. 207-250 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Scholars working in philosophy of action still struggle with the freedom/determinism dichotomy that stretches back to Hellenist philosophy and the metaphysics that gave rise to it. Although that metaphysics has been repudiated in current philosophy of mind and cognitive science, the dichotomy still haunts these fields. As such, action is understood as distinct from movement, or motion. In early China, under a very different metaphysical paradigm, no such distinction is made. Instead, a notion of self-caused movement, or spontaneity, is elaborated. In this article a general conception of spontaneity from early Daoism is explained, detailing its constituent aspects. Similar notions appeared from time to time in Western philosophy, and these instances are pursued, exploring how their instantiations differed from Daoist spontaneity and why. Based on these approximate examples of spontaneity and on early Daoist spontaneity, new criteria are postulated for a plausible theory of action that dispenses with presuppositions that eventuate in a freedom/determinism dichotomy, and instead the possibility is offered of a general model of action that can be applied smoothly across current philosophical and cognitive scientific subdisciplines.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRUTRO
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Confucian Theory of Shame.Barrett, Nathaniel F.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-04-17

Total views
154 ( #17,118 of 38,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #22,734 of 38,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.