Making Room for Particulars: Plato’s Receptacle as Space, Not Substratum

Apeiron 49 (3):303-328 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The ‘traditional’ interpretation of the Receptacle in Plato’s Timaeus maintains that its parts act as substrata to ordinary particulars such as dogs and tables: particulars are form-matter compounds to which Forms supply properties and the Receptacle supplies a substratum, as well as a space in which these compounds come to be. I argue, against this view, that parts of the Receptacle cannot act as substrata for those particulars. I also argue, making use of contemporary discussions of supersubstantivalism, against a substratum interpretation that separates substratum and space in the Timaeus.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BUCMRF
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-06-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-02-05

Total views
159 ( #32,153 of 59,033 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,602 of 59,033 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.