Olympians and Vampires - Talent, practice, and why most of us 'don't get it'

Argumenta:1-11 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Why do some people become WNBA champions or Olympic gold medalists and others do not? What is ‘special’ about those very few incredibly skilled athletes, and why do they, in particular, get to be special? In this paper, I attempt to make sense of the relationship that there is, in the case of sports champions, between so-called ‘talent’, i.e. natural predisposition for particular physical activities and high-pressure competition, and practice/training. I will articulate what I take to be the ‘mechanism’ that allows certain people to rise to the Olympus of athletic excellence, and what being part of this elite club ‘feels like’. My proposal is based on the idea that so-called talent and practice interact in complex and unsystematic ways. I will also argue that becoming a top athlete involves undergoing a special kind of transformation, which makes such people qualitatively different from any ‘normal’ sport amateur, even when the difference might not be immediately visible to the ‘untrained’ eye.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-10-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
68 ( #57,166 of 69,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #52,202 of 69,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.