Criticism. Destructive and Constructive

Mεtascience 1:online (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the scientific communities most criticisms are constructive, while they are destructive in the humanistic circles. Indeed, scientists circulate their drafts among colleagues and students, hoping to elicit their comments and suggestions before submitting their work to publication. In contrast, philosophers and political thinkers attack their rivals, without sparing arguments ad hominem or even insults. The reason for this difference is that scientists are after the truth, whereas most humanists fight for more or less noble causes, from swelling their own curricula to joining crusades for or against rationality, realism, justice, or what have you.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BUNCDA
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-07-13
Latest version: 3 (2021-03-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-13

Total views
84 ( #43,014 of 58,310 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #17,648 of 58,310 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.