Reviewing academic books: are there ethical issues?

Journal of Information Ethics 11 (1):57-65 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The process of deciding which books academics submit should be published favors authors who are associated with the most prestigious universities and other research institutions. Some feel this bias could be minimized if the review of academic books were carried out as anonymously as is the review of articles for journal publication. Not likely to happen soon, however, because both academic and publishing industries promote the hierarchy of perceived excellence that permeates the process of publishing academic books. To find this process to be in any way unethical one needs to move beyond individual-oriented approaches and adopt a social perspective that fosters fundamental fairness, equal opportunity, and equal respect. Here I assume these values as I focus on pre-publication of philosophical work in the United States.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BYRRAB
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-03-18

Total views
82 ( #45,921 of 2,439,465 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #41,012 of 2,439,465 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.