The Importance of Developing a Foundation for Naive Category Theory

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):237-242 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently Feferman has outlined a program for the development of a foundation for naive category theory. While Ernst has shown that the resulting axiomatic system is still inconsistent, the purpose of this note is to show that nevertheless some foundation has to be developed before naive category theory can replace axiomatic set theory as a foundational theory for mathematics. It is argued that in naive category theory currently a ‘cookbook recipe’ is used for constructing categories, and it is explicitly shown with a formalized argument that this “foundationless” naive category theory therefore contains a paradox similar to the Russell paradox of naive set theory
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CABTIO-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
General Theory of Natural Equivalences.MacLane, Saunders & Eilenberg, Samuel

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-28

Total views
162 ( #18,811 of 41,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #20,151 of 41,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.