Benardete’s paradox and the logic of counterfactuals

Analysis 78 (1):22-34 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I consider a puzzling case presented by Jose Benardete, and by appeal to this case develop a paradox involving counterfactual conditionals. I then show that this paradox may be leveraged to argue for certain non-obvious claims concerning the logic of counterfactuals.
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Conditionals.Stalnaker, Robert
Inquiry.Barwise, Jon
Inquiry.Stalnaker, R.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
201 ( #19,517 of 46,392 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #21,971 of 46,392 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.