Tough Love

Florida Philosophical Review 5 (1):35-44 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I examine Bernard Williams’ claim that an appealing conception of love can come into conflict with impartial morality. First, I explain how Williams’ claim can survive one strategy to head off the possibility of conflict. I then examine J.D.Velleman’s Kantian conception of love as another possible way to reject Williams’ claim. I argue, however, that Velleman’s attempt to transcend love’s partiality in his account of love produces an unappealing and unconvincing ideal. This is made particularly clear, I suggest, by the analysis that Velleman is forced to give of the kind of case that generated Williams’ observations in the first place. Thus Velleman’s account should be rejected
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-05-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Love and History.Christopher Grau - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #48,894 of 48,969 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #37,057 of 48,969 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.