Epistemic vs Ontic Classification of quantum entangled states?

Discusiones Filosóficas 13 (20):137 - 145 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this brief paper, starting from recent works, we analyze from conceptual point of view this basic question: can be the nature of quantum entangled states interpreted ontologically or epistemologically? According some works, the degrees of freedom of quantum systems permit us to establish a possible classification between factorizables and entangled states. We suggest, that the "choice" of degree of freedom, even if mathematically justified introduces epistemic element, not only in the systems but also in their classification. We retain, instead, that there are not two classes of quantum states, entangled and factorizables, but only a single classes of states: the entangled states. In fact, the factorizable states become entangled for a different choice of their degrees of freedom. In the same way, there are not partitions of quantum system which have an ontological superior status with respect to any other. For all these reasons, both mathematical tools utilized are responsible of improper classification of quantum systems. Finally, we argue that we cannot speak about a classification of quantum systems: all the quantum states exhibit a unique objective nature, they are all entangled states
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CAPEVO-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-06-22
Latest version: 1 (2012-06-22)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-06-22

Total views
389 ( #12,835 of 54,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,919 of 54,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.