Local Supermajorities

Erkenntnis 81 (2):391-406 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper explores two non-standard supermajority rules in the context of judgment aggregation over multiple logically connected issues. These rules set the supermajority threshold in a local, context sensitive way—partly as a function of the input profile of opinions. To motivate the interest of these rules, I prove two results. First, I characterize each rule in terms of a condition I call ‘Block Preservation’. Block preservation says that if a majority of group members accept a judgment set, then so should the group. Second, I show that one of these rules is, in a precise sense, a judgment aggregation analogue of a rule for connecting qualitative and quantitative belief that has been recently defended by Hannes Leitgeb. The structural analogy is due to the fact that Leitgeb sets thresholds for qualitative beliefs in a local, context sensitive way—partly as a function of the given credence function.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARLS-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation.List, Christian & Dietrich, Franz

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-20

Total views
391 ( #7,747 of 41,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #8,793 of 41,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.