Science, Religion and Common Sense

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Susan Haack has recently attempted to discredit religion by showing that science is an extended and enhanced version of common sense while religion is not. I argue that Haack’s account is misguided not because science is not an extended version of common sense, as she says. It is misguided because she assumes a very restricted, and thus inadequate, account of common sense. After reviewing several more realistic models of common sense, I conclude that common sense is rich enough to allow various kinds of extensions. Just as science can be correctly seen as an enhanced version of common sense, so also religion.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARSRA-8
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-10

Total views
212 ( #21,830 of 52,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #14,310 of 52,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.