Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question: Chad Carmichael

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):475-490 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The special composition question is the question, ‘When do some things compose something?’ The answers to this question in the literature have largely been at odds with common sense, either by allowing that any two things compose something, or by denying the existence of most ordinary composite objects. I propose a new ‘series-style’ answer to the special composition question that accords much more closely with common sense, and I defend this answer from van Inwagen's objections. Specifically, I will argue that the proposed answer entails the transitivity of parthood, that it is non-circular, and that it casts some light on the ancient puzzle about the Ship of Theseus.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-11-15
Latest version: 6 (2018-10-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Four Dimensionalism.Sider, Theodore
On What Grounds What.Schaffer, Jonathan

View all 84 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Composition.Korman, Daniel Z. & Carmichael, Chad
Against Conservatism in Metaphysics.Fairchild, Maegan & Hawthorne, John
Ordinary Objects.Korman, Daniel Z.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
2,514 ( #644 of 47,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
326 ( #1,078 of 47,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.