Looking into the shadow: The eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices

Monash Bioethics Review 36 (1-4):1-22 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Eugenics is often referred to in debates on the ethics of reproductive technologies and practices, in relation to the creation of moral boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable technologies, and acceptable and unacceptable uses of these technologies. Historians have argued that twentieth century eugenics cannot be reduced to a uniform set of practices, and that no simple lessons can be drawn from this complex history. Some authors stress the similarities between past eugenics and present reproductive technologies and practices (what I define throughout the paper as ‘the continuity view’) in order to condemn the latter. Others focus on the differences between past and present practices (what I define throughout the paper as ‘the discontinuity view’) in order to defend contemporary reproductive technologies. In this paper, I explore the meanings of the word ‘eugenics’ and the relationship between its past and present uses in terms of contemporary debates on reproductive technologies and practices. I argue that moral disagreement about present technologies originate in divergent views of condemnable and justifiable features of the past.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CAVLIT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-06-06

Total views
122 ( #33,451 of 54,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #26,334 of 54,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.