Ontology and medical terminology: Why description logics are not enough

In Proceedings of the Conference: Towards an Electronic Patient Record (TEPR 2003). Boston, MA: Medical Records Institute (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ontology is currently perceived as the solution of first resort for all problems related to biomedical terminology, and the use of description logics is seen as a minimal requirement on adequate ontology-based systems. Contrary to common conceptions, however, description logics alone are not able to prevent incorrect representations; this is because they do not come with a theory indicating what is computed by using them, just as classical arithmetic does not tell us anything about the entities that are added or subtracted. In this paper we shall show that ontology is indeed an essential part of any solution to the problems of medical terminology – but only if it is understood in the right sort of way. Ontological engineering, we shall argue, should in every case go hand in hand with a sound ontological theory.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CEUOAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.Barry Smith & Achille C. Varzi - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401-420.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-11

Total views
94 ( #25,484 of 40,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #23,729 of 40,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.