God, Human Memory, and the Certainty of Geometry: An Argument Against Descartes

Philosophy and Theology 28 (2):299–310 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Descartes holds that the tell-tale sign of a solid proof is that its entailments appear clearly and distinctly. Yet, since there is a limit to what a subject can consciously fathom at any given moment, a mnemonic shortcoming threatens to render complex geometrical reasoning impossible. Thus, what enables us to recall earlier proofs, according to Descartes, is God’s benevolence: He is too good to pull a deceptive switch on us. Accordingly, Descartes concludes that geometry and belief in God must go hand in hand. However, I argue that, while theism adds a layer of psychological reassurance, the mind-independent reality of God would ensure the preservation of past demonstrations for atheists as well.

Author's Profile

Marc Champagne
Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-28

Downloads
174 (#72,205)

6 months
77 (#52,147)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?