Juliette: A model of sexual consent

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The ‘yes means yes’ model of sexual consent and the political and ethical commitments that underpin this model have three fundamental disadvantages. This position unfairly polices the sexual expression of participants; it demands an unreasonably high standard for defining sexual interaction as consensual; and by denying the body’s capacity for expressing sexual consent this model allows perpetrators of sexual violence to define consent. I argue that a critical examination of Marquis de Sade’s novel Juliette can provide the basis for a model of sexual consent that avoids these problems by refraining from pre-judging the means by which consent is communicated.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAJAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-26

Total views
2,632 ( #504 of 43,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
257 ( #1,463 of 43,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.