Review of On Psychological and Visionary Art: Notes from C G Jung’s Lecture Gérard de Nerval’s ‘Aurélia’ [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Susan Neiman pointed out to this reviewer the danger that Carl Jung studies pose to contemporary scholars. It is keeping in mind Neiman's cautionary advice that this review establishes Jung's contributions to Romanticism. "[Craig] Stephenson’s analysis of Aurélia has now superseded Arthur Lovejoy’s (1873–1962) and Mario Praz’s (1896–1982) contributions to the definitions of Romanticism."
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAROO-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-06-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-06-22

Total views
55 ( #41,684 of 51,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #9,715 of 51,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.