Wittgenstein and Husserl: Context Meaning Theory

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The present article concentrates on understanding the limits of language from the realm of meaning theory as portrayed by Wittgenstein. In the Tractatus, Wittgenstein’s picture theory provides a glimpse of reality by indicating that a picture could be true or false from the perspective of reality. He talks about an internal limitation of language rather than an external limitation of language. In Wittgenstein’s later works like Philosophical Investigations, the concept of picture theory has faded away, and he deeply becomes more interested in the ‘use theory of meaning’ and ‘language game.’ My other attempt in this paper is to show Husserl’s theory of meaning and try to find out its compatibility with Wittgenstein’s thoughts. Husserl thinks that as a part of phenomenological experience, ‘meaning’ should be an act character that Wittgenstein rejected as an appeal of inner experience. Like Mohanty, I also attempt to show the Husserlian idea of meaning as an essence that is related to the meaning rather than linguistics. Both the giants are talking about description of language from different levels. My effort would be to illustrate how these two giant thinkers proclaim their meaning theories in such a way that leads to a well-known internalism versus externalism debate in the philosophy of mind and language.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAWAH
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Intentionality.Mohanty, J. N.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-04

Total views
138 ( #27,841 of 50,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #39,442 of 50,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.