Against Nagel - In Favour of a Compound Human Ergon

Dialogue 38 (2-3):77-82 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Nagel argues that Aristotle identifies rationality as the ergon idion of the human being. Against Nagel, I defend a reading of Aristotle which depicts a complex human ergon. This complex identity involves desire. It is in Book X of the Nichomachean Ethics that my understanding of Aristotle's position is clinched.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-20

Downloads
199 (#71,572)

6 months
113 (#35,823)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?