Protest and Speech Act Theory

In Rebecca Mason (ed.), Hermeneutical Injustice. Routledge. pp. 179-192 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper attempts to explain what a protest is by using the resources of speech-act theory. First, we distinguish the object, redress, and means of a protest. This provided a way to think of atomic acts of protest as having dual communicative aspects, viz., a negative evaluation of the object and a connected prescription of redress. Second, we use Austin’s notion of a felicity condition to further characterize the dual communicative aspects of protest. This allows us to distinguish protest from some other speech acts which also involve a negative evaluation of some object and a connected prescription of redress. Finally, we turn to Kukla and Lance’s idea of a normative functionalist analysis of speech acts to advance the view that protests are a complex speech act constituted by dual input normative statuses and dual output normative statuses.

Author Profiles

Graham Hubbs
University of Idaho
Matthew Chrisman
University of Edinburgh


Added to PP

1,230 (#9,812)

6 months
231 (#11,067)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?