Causation, norms, and omissions: A study of causal judgments

Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):279-293 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many philosophical theories of causation are egalitarian, rejecting a distinction between causes and mere causal conditions. We sought to determine the extent to which people's causal judgments discriminate, selecting as causes counternormal events—those that violate norms of some kind—while rejecting non-violators. We found significant selectivity of this sort. Moreover, priming that encouraged more egalitarian judgments had little effect on subjects. We also found that omissions are as likely as actions to be judged as causes, and that counternormative selectivity appears to apply equally to actions and omissions.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-06-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Cause and Norm.Hitchcock, Christopher & Knobe, Joshua
Causation.Lewis, David K.
Dispositional Theories of Value.Smith, Michael; Lewis, David & Johnston, Mark
Concepts: Core Readings.Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen (eds.)

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Cause by Omission and Norm: Not Watering Plants.Henne, Paul; Pinillos, Ángel & De Brigard, Felipe

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
448 ( #6,277 of 40,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #15,620 of 40,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.