Debunking Arguments: Mathematics, Logic, and Modal Security

In Robert Richards and Michael Ruse (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics. Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I discuss the structure of genealogical debunking arguments. I argue that they undermine our mathematical beliefs if they undermine our moral beliefs. The contrary appearance stems from a confusion of arithmetic truths with (first-order) logical truths, or from a confusion of reliability with justification. I conclude with a discussion of the cogency of debunking arguments, in light of the above. Their cogency depends on whether information can undermine all of our beliefs of a kind, F, without giving us direct reason to doubt that our F-beliefs are modally secure.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-01-08
Latest version: 2 (2016-01-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Quine, Willard V. O.
Thinking How to Live.Gibbard, Allan

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
273 ( #13,184 of 43,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #11,400 of 43,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.