Debunking Arguments: Mathematics, Logic, and Modal Security

In Robert Richards and Michael Ruse (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics. Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I discuss the structure of genealogical debunking arguments. I argue that they undermine our mathematical beliefs if they undermine our moral beliefs. The contrary appearance stems from a confusion of arithmetic truths with (first-order) logical truths, or from a confusion of reliability with justification. I conclude with a discussion of the cogency of debunking arguments, in light of the above. Their cogency depends on whether information can undermine all of our beliefs of a kind, F, without giving us direct reason to doubt that our F-beliefs are modally secure.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLADAM
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-01-08
Latest version: 2 (2016-01-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Quine, Willard V. O.
Thinking How to Live.Gibbard, Allan

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-01-08

Total views
273 ( #13,184 of 43,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #11,400 of 43,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.