Debunking Arguments: Mathematics, Logic, and Modal Security

In Robert Richards and Michael Ruse (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics. Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I discuss the structure of genealogical debunking arguments. I argue that they undermine our mathematical beliefs if they undermine our moral beliefs. The contrary appearance stems from a confusion of arithmetic truths with (first-order) logical truths, or from a confusion of reliability with justification. I conclude with a discussion of the cogency of debunking arguments, in light of the above. Their cogency depends on whether information can undermine all of our beliefs of a kind, F, without giving us direct reason to doubt that our F-beliefs are modally secure.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLADAM
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-01-08
Latest version: 2 (2016-01-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-01-08

Total views
411 ( #14,629 of 2,439,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #20,932 of 2,439,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.