Functionalism and the role of psychology in economics

Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (4):292-310 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Should economics study the psychological basis of agents' choice behaviour? I show how this question is multifaceted and profoundly ambiguous. There is no sharp distinction between "mentalist'' answers to this question and rival "behavioural'' answers. What's more, clarifying this point raises problems for mentalists of the "functionalist'' variety (Dietrich and List, 2016). Firstly, functionalist hypotheses collapse into hypotheses about input--output dispositions, I show, unless one places some unwelcome restrictions on what counts as a cognitive variable. Secondly, functionalist hypotheses make some risky commitments about the plasticity of agents' choice dispositions.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAFAT-12
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-07-12
Latest version: 2 (2021-11-24)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-12

Total views
344 ( #23,078 of 71,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #16,577 of 71,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.