What is the Benacerraf Problem?

In Fabrice Pataut (ed.), New Perspectives on the Philosophy of Paul Benacerraf: Truth, Objects, Infinity. Springer Verlag (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In "Mathematical Truth", Paul Benacerraf articulated an epistemological problem for mathematical realism. His formulation of the problem relied on a causal theory of knowledge which is now widely rejected. But it is generally agreed that Benacerraf was onto a genuine problem for mathematical realism nevertheless. Hartry Field describes it as the problem of explaining the reliability of our mathematical beliefs, realistically construed. In this paper, I argue that the Benacerraf Problem cannot be made out. There simply is no intelligible problem that satisfies all of the constraints which have been placed on the Benacerraf Problem. The point generalizes to all arguments with the structure of the Benacerraf Problem aimed at realism about a domain meeting certain conditions. Such arguments include so-called "Evolutionary Debunking Arguments" aimed at moral realism. I conclude with some suggestions about the relationship between the Benacerraf Problem and the Gettier Problem.
Reprint years
2016, 2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAWIT-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-06-28
Latest version: 16 (2016-11-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is There a Reliability Challenge for Logic?Joshua Schechter - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):325-347.
Objectivity and Reliability.Clarke-Doane, Justin

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-02-11

Total downloads
667 ( #2,717 of 37,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #5,214 of 37,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.