How Explanation Guides Confirmation

Philosophy of Science 84 (2):359-68 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Where E is the proposition that [If H and O were true, H would explain O], William Roche and Elliot Sober have argued that P(H|O&E) = P(H|O). In this paper I argue that not only is this equality not generally true, it is false in the very kinds of cases that Roche and Sober focus on, involving frequency data. In fact, in such cases O raises the probability of H only given that there is an explanatory connection between them.

Author's Profile

Nevin Climenhaga
Australian Catholic University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-03

Downloads
896 (#12,975)

6 months
137 (#19,240)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?