Fact/Value Holism, Feminist Philosophy, and Nazi Cancer Research

Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 1 (1):1-12 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Fact/value holism has become commonplace in philosophy of science, especially in feminist literature. However, that facts are bearers of empirical content, while values are not, remains a firmly-held distinction. I support a more thorough-going holism: both facts and values can function as empirical claims, related in a seamless, semantic web. I address a counterexample from Kourany where facts and values seem importantly discontinuous, namely, the simultaneous support by the Nazis of scientifically sound cancer research and morally unsound political policies. I conclude that even by the criteria available at the time, Nazi cancer research was empirically weak, and the weaknesses in their research are continuous with their moral failures in just the ways predicted by the holism I support.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLOFHF
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-12-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-07-24

Total views
154 ( #28,226 of 53,583 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #30,969 of 53,583 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.