Religious authority and the transmission of abstract god concepts

Philosophical Psychology 31 (4):609-628 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the Standard Model account of religion, religious concepts tend to conform to “minimally counterintuitive” schemas. Laypeople may, to varying degrees, verbally endorse the abstract doctrines taught by professional theologians. But, outside the Sunday school exam room, the implicit representations that tend to guide people’s everyday thinking, feeling, and behavior are about minimally counterintuitive entities. According to the Standard Model, these implicit representations are the essential thing to be explained by the cognitive science of religion. It is argued here that this theoretical orientation of mainstream CSR misses a whole dimension of religiosity—the acceptance of certain religious authorities, that is, the acceptance of other people’s superior expertise. Average believers tend to accept the authority of religious experts who espouse highly counterintuitive ideas that they understand in a distorted form, if at all....
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COFRAA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-11
Latest version: 5 (2018-05-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist.Joshua Knobe - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):315.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-08

Total downloads
59 ( #24,062 of 34,551 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #9,924 of 34,551 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.