The Harm Principle and Parental Licensing

Social Theory and Practice 43 (4):825-849 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Hugh LaFollette proposed parental licensing in 1980 (and 2010)--not as a requirement for pregnancy, but for raising a child. If you have a baby, are not licensed, and do not get licensed, the baby would be put up for adoption. Despite the intervention required in an extremely personal area of life, I argue that those who endorse the harm principle ought to endorse parental licensing of this sort. Put differently, I show how the harm principle strengthens the case for parental licensing.
Categories
ISBN(s)
0037-802X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COHTHP-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-10

Total views
73 ( #47,025 of 2,433,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,012 of 2,433,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.